From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escuted v. DermaClinic N.Y. LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 24, 2024
22 Civ. 10685 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2024)

Opinion

22 Civ. 10685 (AT)

01-24-2024

KATHLEEN ESCUTED. individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. Plaintiff, v. DERMACLINIC NEW YORK LLC, VERONICA ALMEIDA, JANE DOE A/K/A “NIDI”, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 28, 2023, the Court held the parlies' request to file cross-motions for summary judgment in abeyance pending settlement discussions. ECF No. 35. The Coiul has been advised that the parties have not reached a settlement. Accordingly:

1. By February 21, 2024, Plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment and 56.1 statement;
2. By March 20, 2024, Defendants shall file their cross-motion for summary judgment, 56.1 statement, and opposition papers to Plaintiff s motion;
3. By April 10, 2024, Plaintiff shall file her opposition to Defendants' motion and her reply, if any;
4. By April 24, 2024, Defendants shall file then reply, if any.

The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Section III(C)(ii) of the Court's Individual Rules, each Rule 56.1 statement must include the opposing party's response.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Escuted v. DermaClinic N.Y. LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 24, 2024
22 Civ. 10685 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Escuted v. DermaClinic N.Y. LLC

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN ESCUTED. individually and on behalf of others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 24, 2024

Citations

22 Civ. 10685 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2024)