From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escobar v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2018
Case No. CV 17-7352-DSF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-7352-DSF (SP)

01-24-2018

BOBBY ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, v. LASD MALE DOE, et al., Defendants.


Administratively Closed

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: (1) plaintiff's claim for equitable relief is dismissed without prejudice; and (2) the remainder of this case is stayed until the related criminal case is no longer pending. The Court Clerk is directed to administratively close this case.

If plaintiff wishes to continue with this case after disposition of the criminal charges against him, he must file a request that the stay be lifted and the case reopened within sixty (60) days of the final disposition of the criminal charges (including all appeals). Any such request to lift the stay must be accompanied by documentary evidence showing that the state criminal case is concluded. If the stay is lifted, the action will proceed at that time, absent any other bar to suit. DATED: 1/24/18

/s/_________

HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Escobar v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2018
Case No. CV 17-7352-DSF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Escobar v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, v. LASD MALE DOE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 17-7352-DSF (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2018)