From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escareno v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03141-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03141-AP

03-19-2013

DENISE M. ESCARENO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Christopher R. Alger, Esq. For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado THAYNE WARNER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Christopher R. Alger, Esq.

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

J. BENEDICT GARCÍA

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

THAYNE WARNER

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 30, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: December 7, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 5, 2013

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated. With regard to prior judicial involvement, the parties note that this matter is not a matter on remand from this or any other court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 6, 2013

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: June 5, 2013

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: June 20, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Both parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

Christopher R. Alger

McDivitt Law Firm

1401 17ty Street, Suite 300

Denver. CO 80202

Telephone (303) 426-4878

E-mail: calger@mcdivittlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

J. BENEDICT GARCÍA

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov

By: M. Thayne Warner

M. Thayne Warner

Special Assistant United States Attorney

1001 Seventeenth Street

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 844-7237

thayne.warner@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Escareno v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03141-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Escareno v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:DENISE M. ESCARENO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03141-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2013)