From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escamilla v. State

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jun 22, 2016
No. 10-16-00180-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. 10-16-00180-CR

06-22-2016

JOSE FRANCISCO ESCAMILLA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas
Trial Court No. 38,991

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jose Francisco Escamilla appeals from the trial court's interlocutory order denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be appealed until after the final judgment is entered. McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) ("The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law."). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed June 22, 2016
Do not publish
[CR25]


Summaries of

Escamilla v. State

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jun 22, 2016
No. 10-16-00180-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Escamilla v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE FRANCISCO ESCAMILLA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jun 22, 2016

Citations

No. 10-16-00180-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 22, 2016)