From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escamilla v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2018
Case No. SACV 17-1360-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. SACV 17-1360-JVS (JEM)

07-17-2018

ARTURO ESCAMILLA, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: July 17, 2018

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Escamilla v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 17, 2018
Case No. SACV 17-1360-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Escamilla v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO ESCAMILLA, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 17, 2018

Citations

Case No. SACV 17-1360-JVS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2018)