From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escambia County, Florida v. Ratchford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 7, 1995
650 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

In Ratchford, it was held the trial court had departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to apply the hourly rate fixed by the Chief Judge's administrative order.

Summary of this case from Bobbitt v. State

Opinion

No. 94-1279.

February 7, 1995.

A Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

David G. Tucker, Escambia County Atty., Pensacola, for petitioner.

F.T. Ratchford, Jr., pro se.

Curtis Golden, State Atty., Pensacola, for respondent.


This cause is before us on Escambia County's petition for writ of certiorari from the trial court's order awarding $20,202.60 in costs and attorney fees to court-appointed defender Ratchford. See Jenkins v. Escambia County, 614 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (providing that the proper vehicle for challenging an order awarding attorney fees to court-appointed counsel is a petition for certiorari). In granting the award, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by not applying the appropriate hourly rates fixed by administrative order of the chief judge for the First Judicial Circuit. § 925.036, Fla. Stat. (1993); Leon County v. McClure, 541 So.2d 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (quashing as excessive and remanding fee award to court-appointed counsel in capital case, noting that administrative orders relating to fees for appointed counsel have been deemed controlling in other cases), rev. denied sub nom. Harper v. Leon County, 551 So.2d 461 (Fla. 1989). Accordingly, we grant Escambia County's petition and remand with directions that the trial court apply the set hourly rates fixed by the administrative order to award Ratchford $9,798.60 in costs and attorney fees. Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County v. Lopez, 518 So.2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (granting petition for writ of certiorari and remanding with directions that the circuit court recalculate the court-appointed attorney fee based upon the hourly rate established by the chief judge of the circuit), rev. denied, 529 So.2d 694 (Fla. 1988).

PETITION GRANTED, REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

BOOTH, JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Escambia County, Florida v. Ratchford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 7, 1995
650 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

In Ratchford, it was held the trial court had departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to apply the hourly rate fixed by the Chief Judge's administrative order.

Summary of this case from Bobbitt v. State

remanding for trial court to apply hourly rates fixed by administrative order relating to fees for court-appointed counsel

Summary of this case from Warner v. Holmes County
Case details for

Escambia County, Florida v. Ratchford

Case Details

Full title:ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. F.T. RATCHFORD AND THE STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 7, 1995

Citations

650 So. 2d 154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Bobbitt v. State

It is not necessary to conduct an evidentiary hearing with respect to whether defense counsel is entitled to…

Sheppard White v. Cty, Jacksonville

In exercising our certiorari jurisdiction, our standard of review is limited to determining whether the trial…