From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esbenshade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 17, 1986
494 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2838.

September 17, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Pinellas County; John T. Ware, III, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann Garrison Paschall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Defendant appeals the order revoking his probation.

There was sufficient evidence to justify the revocation of probation, and the trial court's oral pronouncements to that effect were not erroneous. However, the order erroneously fails to recite the conditions of probation which were violated. See Meyer v. State, 445 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Dunlap v. State, 405 So.2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

Accordingly, we remand for correction of the order but otherwise affirm.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Esbenshade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 17, 1986
494 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Esbenshade v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD LEE ESBENSHADE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 17, 1986

Citations

494 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

Appellant relies on cases where the trial court made oral pronouncements which did not conform to the written…

Chaplin v. State

We find that there is sufficient evidence to support such finding and that such violations justified…