From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erwin v. Reubart

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 26, 2023
2:23-cv-00697-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00697-ART-NJK

10-26-2023

PAMELA ERWIN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM REUBART, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ANNE R. TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pamela Erwin, an individual incarcerated at Nevada's Florence McClure Women's Correctional Center, initiated this action, pro se, on May 4, 2023. In an order entered on May 8, 2023 (ECF No. 3), the Court gave Erwin 90 days-until August 7, 2023 (August 6 was a Sunday)-to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On July 31, 2023, Erwin filed her habeas petition (ECF No. 4). Erwin did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis by August 7, however, and on August 14, 2023, the Court, acting sua sponte, extended the time for Erwin to file an in forma pauperis application to October 13, 2023 (ECF No. 5). On September 7, 2023, Erwin filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6), but that application is incomplete because it does not include the required financial certificate. See LSR 1-2. Erwin included a note on her in forma pauperis application saying that she was in the process of obtaining a financial certificate and would file it when she received it; however, Erwin did not file the financial certificate, and she did not take any other action, by the October 13, 2023, deadline.

The Court will, therefore, deny Erwin's September 7, 2023, in forma pauperis application and will set a new deadline for payment of the filing fee or a new application to proceed in forma pauperis, after counsel appears for her.

State prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed counsel unless the circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent due process violations. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 431 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam)). The court may, however, appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings if the interests of justice so require. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. It appears that appointment of counsel is warranted in this case. The Court will therefore grant Erwin's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-3) and appoint the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) to represent her.

The Court has examined Erwin's habeas petition (ECF No. 4) pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts and determines that it merits service upon the Respondents. The Court will order the petition served upon the Respondents, and will direct the Respondents to appear, but will not require any further action on the part of the Respondents at this time.

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 4) is denied.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to separately file the Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 1-3).

It is further ordered that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 1-3) is granted. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed to represent Petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent Petitioner, because of a conflict of interest or any other reason, alternate counsel will be appointed. Counsel will represent Petitioner in all federal court proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to withdraw.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to electronically serve upon the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 4).

It is further ordered that the FPD will have 30 days from the date of this order to file a notice of appearance, or to indicate to the Court its inability to represent Petitioner in this case.

It is further ordered that the Court will set a deadline for payment of the filing fee or the filing of a new in forma pauperis motion after counsel appears for Petitioner.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to add Aaron Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and to provide Respondents an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the Notice of Electronic Filing to the office of the Attorney General only.

It is further ordered that Respondents will have 30 days from the date of this order to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond to the habeas petition at this time.

It is further ordered that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), William Reubart is substituted for “Gabriella Najara” as the respondent warden. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect this change.


Summaries of

Erwin v. Reubart

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 26, 2023
2:23-cv-00697-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Erwin v. Reubart

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA ERWIN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM REUBART, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 26, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00697-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 26, 2023)