From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ervin v. Estopare

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 22, 2009
No. CV 09-8024-PCT-NVW (D. Ariz. Dec. 22, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV 09-8024-PCT-NVW.

December 22, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Dismissal Without Prejudice (doc. #69) and the Response (doc. #76). There is no need to await a reply. The Motion is a timely motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 and the Court will treat it as such. Defendant had filed her own Motion to Dismiss (doc. #64), which the Court had not seen when it granted Plaintiff's own motion for voluntary dismissal on October 27, 2009. In particular, in light of the effort and expense Defendant has expended in defending this action, it was inappropriate to allow Plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss this action without considering Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on the merits.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Reconsider Dismissal Without Prejudice (doc. #69) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order of dismissal of October 27, 2009, (doc. #63) is vacated, and this action is reinstated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order of October 27, 2009, (doc. #65) is vacated, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (doc. #64) is reinstated. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (doc. #64) by January 8, 2010, and Defendant may file a reply within ten calendar days of the mailing of Plaintiff's response.


Summaries of

Ervin v. Estopare

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 22, 2009
No. CV 09-8024-PCT-NVW (D. Ariz. Dec. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Ervin v. Estopare

Case Details

Full title:Bobby A. Ervin, Plaintiff, v. Lisa M. Estopare, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

No. CV 09-8024-PCT-NVW (D. Ariz. Dec. 22, 2009)