Erven v. Springer

4 Citing cases

  1. Martin v. Stone

    No. 02-22-00346-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 17, 2023)

    (quoting Tate, 119 S.W.3d at 380); Erven v. Springer, No. 02-16-00350-CV, 2017 WL 2471096, at *3 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth June 8, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same).

  2. Martin v. Stone

    No. 02-22-00346-CV (Tex. App. May. 18, 2023)

    (quoting Tate, 119 S.W.3d at 380); Erven v. Springer, No. 02-16-00350-CV, 2017 WL 2471096, at *3 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth June 8, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.)

  3. King-Boling v. Cornerstone Baptist Church of Arlington

    No. 02-22-00340-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 27, 2023)

    "The duty to exercise diligence is a continuous one, extending from the date suit is filed until service is obtained." Perez v. Thomas, No. 02-18-00253-CV, 2019 WL 2432155, at *2 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth June 6, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.); Erven v. Springer, No. 02-16-00350-CV, 2017 WL 2471096, at *3 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth June 8, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).

  4. Prescod v. Tkach

    No. 02-21-00162-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2022)   Cited 15 times
    Declining to address whether emergency orders permit retroactive extension of the statute of limitations

    We hold that these four periods of delay-one of six weeks, another of over six weeks, yet another of six months, and the last of three months, none of them adequately explained-together show Appellants' lack of diligence as a matter of law. See Erven v.Springer, No. 02-16-00350-CV, 2017 WL 2471096, at *4 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth June 8, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.) (concluding that unexplained gaps of six weeks, three months, and three months, taken together, showed lack of diligence as a matter of law).