Opinion
March 7, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants did not identify their witnesses who allegedly would be inconvenienced, their willingness to testify, and the nature of their anticipated testimony. Accordingly, they failed to satisfy their burden of establishing a basis for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) (see, Alexandre v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., 150 A.D.2d 742). Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.