From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ernster v. Harcsztark

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2021-67372 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2021-67372 Index 33907/2017

06-09-2021

Marguly Ernster, plaintiff-respondent, v. Harry J. Harcsztark, etc., appellant, Miriam Aranoff D.D.S. PLLC, defendant-respondent. Motion No. 2019-12087


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P. SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX ROBERT J. MILLER PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 24, 2019. Motion by the plaintiff-respondent to extend the time to serve and file a brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before July 9, 2021, the plaintiff-respondent shall serve and file the plaintiff-respondent's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the brief and upload a digital copy of the brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website.

RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, MILLER and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ernster v. Harcsztark

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Jun 9, 2021
No. 2021-67372 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Ernster v. Harcsztark

Case Details

Full title:Marguly Ernster, plaintiff-respondent, v. Harry J. Harcsztark, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-67372 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 9, 2021)