From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erion v. Board of Pension Commrs., Hoboken

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 297 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Submitted May 26, 1933 —

Decided September 27, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the appellant, Chandless, Weller Selser.

For the respondents, Horace L. Allen.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Supreme Court, to whom the matter was submitted by consent, which is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 122.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Erion v. Board of Pension Commrs., Hoboken

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 297 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Erion v. Board of Pension Commrs., Hoboken

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE ERION, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PENSION COMMISSIONERS OF HOBOKEN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1933

Citations

168 A. 297 (N.J. 1933)
168 A. 297

Citing Cases

City of Jersey City v. Zink

We are warranted in determining these questions to consider the purpose and effect of these acts and are not…

In re Freygang

In determining whether a law is general or special, the court will look to its substance and necessary…