From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erickson v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 28, 2005
No. CIV S-05-2501 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2501 GEB KJM P.

December 28, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Sonoma County Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Sonoma County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.


Summaries of

Erickson v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 28, 2005
No. CIV S-05-2501 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2005)
Case details for

Erickson v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:JASON ERICKSON, Petitioner, v. TERESA SCHWARTZ, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 28, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2501 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2005)