From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ERG Aerospace Corporation v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 17, 2014
3:13-cv-2973 VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2014)

Opinion

          JEFFREY B. SETNESS, FABIAN & CLENDENIN, P.C., Las Vegas, Nevada, Incoming Attorney for Plaintiff ERG Aerospace Corporation.

          ERG AEROSPACE CORPORATION ENERGY RESEARCH & GENERATION, INC., Bryan Leyda, THOMAS F. CARLUCCI, ESQ., Foley & Lardner LLP, San Francisco California, MARK THOMAS SCHIEBLE, ESQ., Foley & Lardner LLP, San Francisco, California.


          STIPULATION TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEYS AND PROPOSED COURT order (LOCAL CIVIL RULE 7-12) AS MODIFIED

          VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

         In accordance with Rule 7-12 of the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Civil Local Rules, Jeffrey B. Setness, Esq. of the law firm FABIAN & CLENDENIN, P.C., hereby files this Stipulation to Substitute Attorneys and Proposed Order:

         Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendants ERG AEROSPACE CORPORATION and/or ENERGY RESEARCH & GENERATION, INC. hereby nominate and appoint Jeffrey B. Setness, Esq. of the law firm FABIAN & CLENDENIN, P.C., to represent them in the above-entitled action, in place and instead of Thomas F. Carlucci, Esq. and Mark Thomas Schieble, Esq. of the law firm of FOLEY & LARDNER, LLP.

         We agree to the substitution of Jeffrey B. Setness, Esq. of the law firm FABIAN & CLENDENIN, P.C. to represent Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendants ERG AEROSPACE CORPORATION and/or ENERGY RESEARCH & GENERATION, INC. in the above-entitled action, in our place and stead.

         I hereby agree to accept this substitution to represent Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendants ERG AEROSPACE CORPORATION and/or ENERGY RESEARCH & GENERATION, INC. in the above-entitled action.

         ORDER AS MODIFIED

         The Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is denied as moot. The Court orders the parties to appear for a Case Management Conference on June 19, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. The parties must meet and confer prior to Thursday and be prepared to propose a trial management schedule at the Case Management Conference.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

ERG Aerospace Corporation v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 17, 2014
3:13-cv-2973 VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2014)
Case details for

ERG Aerospace Corporation v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ERG AEROSPACE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jun 17, 2014

Citations

3:13-cv-2973 VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2014)