From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

eResearchTechnology, Inc. v. CRF, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 17, 2017
2016-2281 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2281

03-17-2017

ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. CRF, INC., DBA CRF HEALTH, Defendant-Appellee

EDWARD POPLAWSKI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by OLIVIA M. KIM; ADAM WILLIAM BURROWBRIDGE, Washington, DC. JOHN C. THOMAS, III, Beck & Thomas, PC, Pittsburgh, PA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD T. TING.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:15-cv-00918-NBF, Judge Nora Barry Fischer.

JUDGMENT

EDWARD POPLAWSKI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by OLIVIA M. KIM; ADAM WILLIAM BURROWBRIDGE, Washington, DC. JOHN C. THOMAS, III, Beck & Thomas, PC, Pittsburgh, PA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD T. TING. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 17, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

eResearchTechnology, Inc. v. CRF, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 17, 2017
2016-2281 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17, 2017)
Case details for

eResearchTechnology, Inc. v. CRF, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. CRF, INC., DBA CRF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2017

Citations

2016-2281 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 17, 2017)