From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erdman v. Victor

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 26, 2022
20 Civ. 4162 (LGS) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2022)

Opinion

20 Civ. 4162 (LGS) (GWG)

07-26-2022

TYLER ERDMAN Plaintiff, v. ADAM VICTOR et al., Defendants.


ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court issues this Order with respect to Docket # 150.

Defendant's opposition letter (Docket # 152) fails to respond to the issues raised by plaintiff in Docket # 150. The fact that there remains time left to complete discovery is irrelevant to whether defendant has timely produced documents, which must be produced within 30 days under Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(b)(2)(A). We therefore deem plaintiff's arguments unopposed.

Accordingly, defendant is hereby ordered to produce all responsive documents within his “possession, custody, or control,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(a)(1), which shall include documents on defendant's office computers and systems including documents on what plaintiff refers to as the “P-Drive,” “office email accounts,” “any devices that underwent forensic analysis,” and defendant's cell phone.

The Court notes that the phrase “possession, custody, or control,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(a)(1), “has been construed broadly.” Coventry Cap. U.S. LLC v. EEA Life Settlements Inc., 334 F.R.D. 68, 72 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (quoting In re: Flag Telecom Holdings, Ltd. Secs. Litig., 236 F.R.D. 177, 180 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)). Rule 34(a)(1) “does not require that the party have legal ownership or actual physical possession of the documents at issue; rather, documents are considered to be under a party's control when that party has the right, authority, or practical ability to obtain the documents from a non-party to the action.” Id. (quoting Bank of N.Y. v. Meridian BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd., 171 F.R.D. 135, 146-47 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)) (emphasis added).

On or before August 3, 2022, defendant shall produce all responsive documents up to the present day that are in his custody and control.

Defendant shall search all documents in repositories under his custody and control, including his office computers and systems including but not limited to the “P-Drive,” office email accounts, any devices that underwent forensic analysis, and his cell phone.

At the time he produces the documents, defendant shall provide plaintiff a sworn statement detailing his efforts to comply with this Order, including what systems and repositories defendant has searched, what custodians were involved, and what efforts defendant made to obtain documents from that custodian.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Erdman v. Victor

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 26, 2022
20 Civ. 4162 (LGS) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Erdman v. Victor

Case Details

Full title:TYLER ERDMAN Plaintiff, v. ADAM VICTOR et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 26, 2022

Citations

20 Civ. 4162 (LGS) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2022)