From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erdman v. Kapture

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 11, 2006
Case No. 99-74336 (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 99-74336.

May 11, 2006


ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


Before the court is Petitioner's motion for reconsideration of this court's March 22, 2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order Striking Pleadings. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) (E.D. Mich. Sept. 8, 1998), no response was ordered and no oral argument was heard.

Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration which merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant shall not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.

LR 7.1(g)(3).

Having filed a motion for reconsideration that presents the same issues ruled upon by the court, Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's April 3, 2006 motion for reconsideration is DENIED.


Summaries of

Erdman v. Kapture

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 11, 2006
Case No. 99-74336 (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Erdman v. Kapture

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS GUY ERDMAN, Petitioner, v. ROBERT KAPTURE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 11, 2006

Citations

Case No. 99-74336 (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2006)