From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erdheim v. Deutsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted March 1, 2001.

April 2, 2001.

In an action to recover legal fees, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated November 23, 1999, which, inter alia, conditionally granted the defendant's cross motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, entered January 15, 1999, upon the defendant's default in complying with a stipulation between the parties, dated July 9, 1998.

Michael Erdheim, Beacon, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Nathan M. Ferst, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant's cross motion to vacate the judgment on condition that he pay the sum of $13,000 to the plaintiff's escrow agent by a date certain (see, McGusty v. McGusty, 268 A.D.2d 508; Siorek v. Zablocki, 267 A.D.2d 299).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Erdheim v. Deutsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Erdheim v. Deutsch

Case Details

Full title:Michael Erdheim, appellant, v. Fred Deutsch, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 2, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 202