Opinion
March 9, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the complaint sufficiently stated causes of action for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract ( see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; 3016 [b]).
Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.