From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erby v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Aug 9, 2024
2:23-cv-02298-SHM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 9, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-02298-SHM-tmp

08-09-2024

RICHARD ERBY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On May 10, 2023, Plaintiffs (1) Richard Erby, (2) Robert L. Love, (3) Jerrahmiah J. Rankins, (4) Dangelo C. Reid, (5) Rodricus Brown, (6) LaTerrance Stewart, (7) Antonio Whitmore, Jr., (8) Jutarian D. Malone, (9) Lavell Pennington, and (10) Szumanki Stroud (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.)

On February 12, 2024, the Court: 1) dismissed Plaintiffs Erby, Rankins, Brown, and Malone without prejudice for failure to prosecute and 2) dismissed Plaintiffs Love, Stewart, Pennington, Reid, and Whitmore without prejudice for failure to notify the Court of their respective present addresses. (ECF Nos. 17, 18, 20.) On August 8, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Stroud without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Accordingly, this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Erby v. State

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Aug 9, 2024
2:23-cv-02298-SHM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Erby v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ERBY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-02298-SHM-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 9, 2024)