From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 14, 1993
617 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-00796.

May 14, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Vincent E. Giglio, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant, E.R., challenges the final order adjudicating him delinquent. We agree with the appellant's contention that the trial court erred in denying his motion for discharge for speedy trial violation. On the ninety-first day after being taken into custody, appellant filed a motion for discharge. Section 39.048, Florida Statutes (1991). The state had an additional fifteen days outside of the ninety-day period to bring this case to trial under Rule 8.090(j)(3), Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure. R.J.A. v. Foster, 603 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1992). A hearing was not held until twenty-one days after the date of the filing of the motion for discharge. We hold the trial court erred in denying the appellant's motion for discharge. Accordingly, we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand with instruction for the court to discharge.

HALL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

E.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 14, 1993
617 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

E.R. v. State

Case Details

Full title:E.R., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 14, 1993

Citations

617 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

B.V. v. State

These hearings were obviously held outside the window period provided by the rule. As in E.R. v. State, 617…