From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coal. for Equity & Excellence in Md. Higher Educ., Inc. v. Md. Higher Educ. Comm'n

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 2, 2019
No. 17-2418 (L) (4th Cir. Jan. 2, 2019)

Opinion

No. 17-2418 (L)

01-02-2019

THE COALITION FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN MARYLAND HIGHER EDUCATION, INC., a/k/a Coalition for Equity and Excellence in Maryland Higher Education; RASHAAN SIMON, a/k/a Rahsaan Simon; DAVID J. BURTON; MURIEL THOMPSON; ANTHONY ROBINSON; DR. CHRIS HEIDELBERG; DAMEIN MONTGOMERY; KELLY THOMPSON; J.S., Plaintiffs - Appellees, and SALLY C. MCMILLAN; TINA M. VINES; DAVID BUTLER; DAPO OLADAPO; NICHOLAS WASHINGTON; DANIELLE WILLIAMS; ZENIA WILSON; JESSICA WINSLOW; CRYSTAL MYERS; JOMARI SMITH; WAYNE BECKLES, Plaintiffs, v. MARYLAND HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION; ANWER HASAN, Chairman of the Maryland Higher Education Commission; JENNIE C. HUNTER-CEVERA, Acting Secretary of Higher Education; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellants, and ROBERT L. EHRLICH, JR., Governor; STATE OF MARYLAND; CALVIN W. BURNETT, Secretary of Higher Education, Defendants. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, Amicus Supporting Appellee.

ARGUED: Adam Dean Snyder, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Michael D. Jones, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jon Marshall Greenbaum, LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellees/Cross-Appellants. ON BRIEF: Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, Jennifer A. DeRose, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Brenda Shum, Genevieve Bonadies Torres, LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, Washington, D.C.; Karen N. Walker, Devin C. Ringger, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Jason S. McCarter, EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND (US) LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Amicus Curiae.


UNPUBLISHED Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-02773-CCB) Before WILKINSON, AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Referred to the Office of the Circuit Mediator by unpublished per curiam order. ARGUED: Adam Dean Snyder, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Michael D. Jones, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jon Marshall Greenbaum, LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellees/Cross-Appellants. ON BRIEF: Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, Jennifer A. DeRose, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Brenda Shum, Genevieve Bonadies Torres, LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, Washington, D.C.; Karen N. Walker, Devin C. Ringger, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Jason S. McCarter, EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND (US) LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Amicus Curiae. ORDER PER CURIAM:

The Court considered the arguments of the parties on December 11, 2018, along with the briefs and other items of record, and notes the points and positions raised by all counsel. Upon mature consideration of all these matters, it appears to the Court that both parties have well-presented arguments, but that neither party has a realistic appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of their respective claims and contentions.

The Court is of the firm conviction that this case can and should be settled. Otherwise, the parties will likely condemn themselves to endless years of acrimonious, divisive and expensive litigation that will only work to the detriment of higher education in Maryland.

Wherefore, upon due and mature consideration, the Court orders the parties to appear before the Circuit Mediator of this Circuit at the date, time, and place such Mediator shall promptly set, and hereby now refers this matter to mediation before such Circuit Mediator pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 33. The Court further directs counsel to forthwith consult with their clients and obtain as much authority as feasible to settle this case.

The Court further takes this case under submission, pending mediation, and directs that the orders of the district court in this matter shall remain stayed pending further order of this Court.

The parties are advised to proceed in all good faith to reach a mediated settlement to be submitted to this Court. The Circuit Mediator shall report his view of the good faith progress of this mediation every 30 days, to the extent permitted by the confidentiality provision of Rule 33. This mediation shall conclude no later than April 30, 2019 and can only be extended by motion of the Chief Mediator for good cause shown.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Coal. for Equity & Excellence in Md. Higher Educ., Inc. v. Md. Higher Educ. Comm'n

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 2, 2019
No. 17-2418 (L) (4th Cir. Jan. 2, 2019)
Case details for

Coal. for Equity & Excellence in Md. Higher Educ., Inc. v. Md. Higher Educ. Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:THE COALITION FOR EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE IN MARYLAND HIGHER EDUCATION…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 2, 2019

Citations

No. 17-2418 (L) (4th Cir. Jan. 2, 2019)