From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Equity Service Corporation v. Agull

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 6, 1936
158 Misc. 780 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)

Opinion

March 6, 1936.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Samuel Firestone, for the appellant.

Arthur Rosenzweig, for the respondent.


The transaction was not one of insurance. We also find that it was not tainted with usury. The motion to dismiss upon the ground of a binding provision to arbitrate was not renewed and must be regarded as waived.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint.

All concur. Present — LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Equity Service Corporation v. Agull

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 6, 1936
158 Misc. 780 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
Case details for

Equity Service Corporation v. Agull

Case Details

Full title:EQUITY SERVICE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. MILTON AGULL, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1936

Citations

158 Misc. 780 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
286 N.Y.S. 379