Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02381-MSK-KLM
03-13-2013
Counsel Appearing: William Moench Jenifer Rodriguez Daniel Satriana
CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER
Courtroom Deputy: Emily Seamon
Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom
Counsel Appearing:
William Moench
Jenifer Rodriguez
Daniel Satriana
COURTROOM MINUTES
HEARING: LAW AND MOTION
3:30 p.m. Court in session.
Discussion regarding the Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Decree and for Dismissal With Prejudice Subject to Entry of Consent Decree [Doc. No. 62].
Counsel represent that the consent decree is fair, adequate, and reasonable, and that it is not a product of collusion or against the public interest.
Discussion regarding a procedural issue.
Oral findings and conclusions of law are made of record and incorporated herein.
ORDER: Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Decree and for Dismissal With Prejudice Subject to Entry of Consent Decree [Doc. No. 62, Filed January 31, 2013] is GRANTED.
ORDER: The Court approves the agreement. The Court finds that the agreement of the parties is fair, adequate, and reasonable. It is neither illegal nor a product of collusion, and it is not against the public's interest.
ORDER: The case is dismissed. All claims are dismissed with prejudice.
3:39 p.m. Court in recess.
Total Time: 00:09
Hearing concluded.