From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Equal Emp't Opportunity Comission v. Maita Chevrolet Geo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
Case No. CV 11 4815 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11 4815 PJH

11-23-2011

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MAITA CHEVROLET GEO, Defendant.

ERIC C. BELLAFRONTO, Bar No. 162102 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant MAITA CHEVROLET GEO


ERIC C. BELLAFRONTO, Bar No. 162102

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

MAITA CHEVROLET GEO

STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE

AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and Maita Chevrolet Geo ("Maita"), by and through their respective attorneys, Cindy O'Hara for the EEOC and Eric C. Bellafronto of Littler Mendelson for Maita, that the proper venue for this matter is the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. This stipulation is made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(b), which provides in pertinent part, that "[u]pon . . . stipulation of all parties, any action, suit or proceeding of a civil nature or any motion or hearing thereof, may be transferred, in the discretion of the court, from the division in which pending to any other division in the same district." The parties agree that venue is proper in the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1404(a), which provides in pertinent part, as follows: "For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought." The parties agree that this action could have been properly brought in the Eastern District of California and that the convenience of the parties and witnesses is furthered by the transfer of this matter because the alleged actions occurred in the Eastern District and most witnesses reside there. The parties therefore respectfully request that the Court transfer this matter to Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division.

SO STIPULATED

By: _______________

ERIC C. BELLAFRONTO

Attorneys for Defendant

MAITA CHEVROLET GEO

By: _______________

CINDY O'HARA

Attorneys for Plaintiff

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

IT IS SO ORDERED,

_______________

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton


Summaries of

Equal Emp't Opportunity Comission v. Maita Chevrolet Geo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
Case No. CV 11 4815 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Equal Emp't Opportunity Comission v. Maita Chevrolet Geo

Case Details

Full title:EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MAITA CHEVROLET GEO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11 4815 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)