From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Mar 4, 2009
No. CV 06-926-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Mar. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV 06-926-PHX-SMM.

March 4, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is the Motion for Withdrawal of Co-Counsel Katherine K. Kruse (Doc. 148). The present case is set for a jury trial starting on June 2, 2009. In accordance with Local Rule 83.3(b)(3), "no attorney is permitted to withdraw as attorney of record after an action has been set for trial . . . unless the Court is otherwise satisfied for good cause shown that the attorney should be permitted to withdraw." As the Motion for Withdrawal contains no reason for the withdrawal of lead counsel only a few months before trial, the Court finds that good cause has not been demonstrated.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING the Motion for Withdrawal of Co-Counsel Katherine K. Kruse (Doc. 148) without prejudice with leave to refile.


Summaries of

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Mar 4, 2009
No. CV 06-926-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Mar. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. AUTOZONE, INC., a…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Mar 4, 2009

Citations

No. CV 06-926-PHX-SMM (D. Ariz. Mar. 4, 2009)