From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Equal Employment Opportunity Comm. v. Dimare Ruskin

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
May 17, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-158-FtM-36SPC (M.D. Fla. May. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-158-FtM-36SPC.

May 17, 2011


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff EEOC's Unopposed Motion Requesting Court Permission to Meet Telephonically to Prepare and File Case Management Report (Doc. #14) filed on May 13, 2011. Plaintiff's Counsel requests permission to appear via telephone at the meeting for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report because the parties are located in different cities (lead counsel for the Plaintiff located in Miami, lead counsel for the Defendant in Tampa). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), Counsel for the parties have conferred and agree to the relief requested. As the use of telephonic hearings and conferences are encouraged, pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(i), the Court will grant the Motion.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

Plaintiff EEOC's Unopposed Motion Requesting Court Permission to Meet Telephonically to Prepare and File Case Management Report (Doc. #14) is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida.


Summaries of

Equal Employment Opportunity Comm. v. Dimare Ruskin

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
May 17, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-158-FtM-36SPC (M.D. Fla. May. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Equal Employment Opportunity Comm. v. Dimare Ruskin

Case Details

Full title:EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. DIMARE RUSKIN…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: May 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-158-FtM-36SPC (M.D. Fla. May. 17, 2011)