From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Epson Portland, Inc. v. Veopradith

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 14, 1993
855 P.2d 1170 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

WCB 91-05537; CA A77431

Argued and submitted July 2, reversed and remanded for reconsideration August 4, reconsideration denied October 27, petition for review denied December 14, 1993 ( 318 Or. 171)

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Jean Back, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Brian B. Doherty, William H. Walters and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager Carlsen, Portland.

Kevin N. Keaney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary Conboy, Portland.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.


Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari, 117 Or. App. 409, 844 P.2d 258 (1992), on recon 120 Or. App. 590, 853 P.2d 315 (1993).


Summaries of

Epson Portland, Inc. v. Veopradith

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 14, 1993
855 P.2d 1170 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Epson Portland, Inc. v. Veopradith

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Phon Veopradith, Claimant. EPSON…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 14, 1993

Citations

855 P.2d 1170 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
855 P.2d 1170