Opinion
No. 2D14–2590.
11-05-2014
David I. Epps, pro se.
David I. Epps, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Pitts v. State, 832 So.2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Mosely v. State, 688 So.2d 999 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ; Desmond v. State, 576 So.2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) ; Luttrell v. State, 513 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) ; Budd v. State, 477 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) ; Foss v. State, 834 So.2d 404 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ; McMillan v. State, 832 So.2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Harris v. State, 789 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) ; Hart v. State, 761 So.2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ; Small v. State, 556 So.2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
DAVIS, C.J., and SILBERMAN and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.