From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EPPS v. MENDOZA-POWERS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV S-04-2227 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2227 DFL KJM P.

August 29, 2006


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


On July 19, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

EPPS v. MENDOZA-POWERS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV S-04-2227 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

EPPS v. MENDOZA-POWERS

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RANDOLPH EPPS, Plaintiff, v. KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2227 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)