From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Epperson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Jun 12, 2018
548 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 106054

06-12-2018

Joshua EPPERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Samuel E. Buffaloe, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for Respondent.


Samuel E. Buffaloe, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.Joshua Epperson appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Epperson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Jun 12, 2018
548 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Epperson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joshua EPPERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Jun 12, 2018

Citations

548 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Bosworth v. State

As was the case with the habeas petitioner in Windeknecht, the Rule 24.035 movants in Watson and…