Opinion
No. 19375
Opinion Filed April 23, 1929.
(Syllabus.)
1. Appeal and Error — Nullity of Case-Made Lacking Attestation of Clerk and Seal of Trial Court — Case-Made not Subject to Correction After Time for Appeal Expires.
A case-made which fails to show the attestation of the clerk of the trial court to the signature of the trial judge settling the case-made and the seal of the trial court affixed thereto is a nullity and brings nothing before this court for review. Held, further, that such case-made cannot be corrected in this respect after the expiration of the period for filing the appeal in this court.
2. Appeal and Error — Errors Occurring on Trial or Involving Motions not Presented in Appeal by Transcript.
An appeal by certified transcript presents only such errors as appear upon the judgment roll, and in order to present errors alleged to have occurred on the trial of the cause or errors involving motions, the record must be presented by bill of exceptions or case-made.
Error from Common Pleas Court, Tulsa County; Wm. Randolph, Judge.
Action between W. R. Eoff et al. and J. A. Seekatz. From an order of the trial court denying motion to vacate judgment and to quash writ of execution, plaintiffs in error appeal. Dismissed.
W. B. Richards, for plaintiffs in error.
A. B. Honnold, for defendant in error.
This is an appeal from the order of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county made and entered on the 16th day of January, 1928, overruling a motion to vacate the judgment formerly rendered in said cause and to quash a writ of execution.
The record is presented as a case-made, and is also certified to by the clerk of the court as a transcript. An examination of the certificate of the trial judge settling and signing the record as a case-made shows the signature of the trial judge thereto is not attested by the clerk of the court and the seal of the court is not affixed thereto, and as a case-made it is a nullity, brings nothing before this court for review, and cannot be corrected in this respect after the expiration of the six months allowed by law in which to appeal. Campbell v. Williams, 104 Okla. 274, 231 P. 226; State ex rel. Gross v. American National Bank, 107 Okla. 265, 232 P. 52; Hillery v. Cox, 125 Okla. 124, 256 P. 915.
The assignments of error embraced in the petition in error — that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial, in overruling the motion to quash writ of execution, and that the court erred in admitting evidence upon the part of the defendant in error — cannot be reviewed on transcript. Richardson v. Biedleman et al., 33 Okla. 463, 126 P. 817; Davis v. DeGeer, 91 Okla. 111, 216 P. 159; Hillery v. Cox, supra.
There is therefore nothing before this court for review, and the appeal is dismissed.