From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Environmental, Safety Hlth. v. Integrated Pro S.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 21, 2008
Case No. CIV-08-1215-D (W.D. Okla. Nov. 21, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-1215-D.

November 21, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Arbitration [Doc. No. 7] is incomplete and premature. The Motion references exhibits that are not attached; the certificate of service reflects mailing to Defendant through a registered agent.

No proof of service under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4( l) has been made in this case. "'[S]ervice of process . . . provides the mechanism by which a court having venue and jurisdiction over the subject matter of an action asserts jurisdiction over the person of the party served.'" See Hukill v. Oklahoma Native American Domestic Violence Coalition, 542 F.3d 794, 797 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Okla. Radio Assocs. v. F.D.I.C., 969 F.2d 940, 943 (10th Cir. 1992)). Further, no attorney has entered an appearance for Defendant, which is an entity that can appear in court only through counsel. See Harrison v. Wahatoyas, L.L.C., 253 F.3d 552, 556 (10th Cir. 2001). Plaintiff must serve a motion on Defendant pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(b)(1) by service on Defendant's attorney, once one files an entry of appearance, unless the Court orders service on the party.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice to refiling at an appropriate time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Environmental, Safety Hlth. v. Integrated Pro S.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Nov 21, 2008
Case No. CIV-08-1215-D (W.D. Okla. Nov. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Environmental, Safety Hlth. v. Integrated Pro S.

Case Details

Full title:ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY HEALTH, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTEGRATED PRO SERVICES…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 21, 2008

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-1215-D (W.D. Okla. Nov. 21, 2008)