From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HRT Enters. v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 21, 2017
Case No. 12-13710 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 12-13710

07-21-2017

HRT ENTERPRISES, a Michigan partnership, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, a Michigan municipal corporation, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS

I.

For the reasons stated on the record on July 17, 2017:

(A) Action on defendant's Motion for Certification Pursuant to 28 USC §1292 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and/or Modification and Confirmation of Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 (Doc. 99) is STAYED.

(B) Plaintiff's Motion In Limine Regarding Funds Paid To Tenants By Defendant City Of Detroit In Prior Lawsuits (Doc. 100) is GRANTED.

(C) Plaintiff's Motion to Bifurcate Trial (Doc. 101) is GRANTED.

II.

Plaintiff says the date of the "take" is January 01, 2009, i.e., the date "the situation became stabilized."

III.

Plaintiff shall within thirty (30) days file a proffer of proofs that it will introduce to support the January 01, 2009, "take" date, in separately numbered paragraphs referencing the exhibits it will rely on, as well as a brief description of each proposed witness' testimony.

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 21, 2017 S:\LORI\CASES\HRT v. City of Detroit\Order on Pending Motions - 07-21-2017.wpd


Summaries of

HRT Enters. v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 21, 2017
Case No. 12-13710 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 21, 2017)
Case details for

HRT Enters. v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:HRT ENTERPRISES, a Michigan partnership, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 21, 2017

Citations

Case No. 12-13710 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 21, 2017)