Opinion
Argued May 2, 1890
Decided June 3, 1890
O.W. Johnson and Edward P. Gould for appellant.
John G. Record for respondent.
FOLLETT, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.
All concur except BRADLEY and HAIGHT, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Ensign v. Ensign
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1890
24 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1890)
Summaries of
Ensign v. Ensign
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1890
24 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1890)
Case details for
Ensign v. Ensign
Case Details
Full title:WALTER H.C. ENSIGN, Respondent, v . DANIEL P. ENSIGN, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 3, 1890
Citations
24 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1890)
24 N.E. 1102
31 N.Y. St. Rptr. 657
Citing Cases
Reich v. Dyer
Whatever may be the law elsewhere, it is a general rule in equity, established by the decisions of the courts…
Zivotosky v. Max( Baugham v. Slane, 181 Misc. 1041, supra.) The true intention of the parties may be shown by oral testimony…