From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ensey v. Culhane

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Feb 12, 1998
706 A.2d 1334 (R.I. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-494-A

February 12, 1998

Appeal from Providence County, Fortunato, J.

Alan M. Barnes, for plaintiff.

Harris Weiner, Joseph S. Larisa, Jr., Thomas A. Palombo, for defendant.


ORDER

Defendants' have appealed a Superior Court order denying their motion for summary judgment in this case. Such orders are interlocutory, and are generally not appealable. Defendants, however, claim that in light of the significance of the issues involved, they should have the right to an immediate appeal from the Superior Court ruling in this case. They are joined in this contention by amici curiae, the governor, Rhode Island Interlocal Risk Management Trust, and the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns.

After careful consideration of the contentions of the defendants and of the amici curiae, we affirm that appellate review of rulings of this nature is properly obtainable by petition for writ of certiorari. Therefore, permitting defendants an interlocutory appeal is unnecessary in this case.

Accordingly, the appeal is denied and dismissed.

Justice Bourcier did not participate.

Entered as an Order of this court this 12th day of February 1998 .

By Order,

_______________________________ Brian B. Burns Clerk Pro Tempore


Summaries of

Ensey v. Culhane

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Feb 12, 1998
706 A.2d 1334 (R.I. 1998)
Case details for

Ensey v. Culhane

Case Details

Full title:KEITH ENSEY v. EDMOND S. CULHANE, JR. SUPERINTENDENT, RHODE ISLAND STATE…

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Feb 12, 1998

Citations

706 A.2d 1334 (R.I. 1998)

Citing Cases

Halloran v. State

We recently noted that a denial of a motion for summary judgment, much like a denial of a motion to dismiss,…

Fayle v. Traudt

Because defendant's appeal is interlocutory, it is not properly before us. Denials of motions for summary…