Enovsys LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Full title: ENOVSYS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 10, 2017

2016-1691 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1691 2016-1767

03-10-2017

ENOVSYS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, Defendants-Cross-Appellants

BRUCE G. CHAPMAN, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by BRYANT C. BOREN, JR., ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Palo Alto, CA; TIMOTHY S. DURST, BRIAN DOUGLAS JOHNSTON, Dallas, TX.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:11-cv-05210-SS, Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.

JUDGMENT

BRUCE G. CHAPMAN, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by BRYANT C. BOREN, JR., ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Palo Alto, CA; TIMOTHY S. DURST, BRIAN DOUGLAS JOHNSTON, Dallas, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 10, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court