Engolia v. Allain

29 Citing cases

  1. Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    774 So. 2d 84 (La. 2000)   Cited 282 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Referring to a Santa Claus figurine

    1 Cir. 12/9/98), 744 So.2d 23. See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La. 6/18/97), 695 So.2d 1326; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, 583 So.2d 829 (La. 1991); State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/3/96), 673 So.2d 1249; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/10/95), 656 So.2d 700; Engollio v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723, 728 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1993); Adams v. Security Ins. Co. Of Hartford, 543 So.2d 480, 486 (La. 1989). The standard of review for a JNOV on appeal is a two part inquiry.

  2. Rea v. Wis. Coach Lines, Inc.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1252 SECTION "K"(3) (E.D. La. Jul. 15, 2015)

    Gibson v. Bossier City General Hospital, et al., supra. See also Engolia v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir.1993). (Emphasis added.)

  3. Berry v. Roberson

    CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00145-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Apr. 28, 2015)

    "[T]he jury's verdict should not be set aside if it is suppoxtable by any fair interpretation of the evidence." Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 774 So.2d 84, 93 (La. 2000) (Engolia v. Allain, 625 So. 2d 723, 729 (La. Ct. App. 1993)). In the instant matter, the Jury Verdict Form reflects following breakout amounts of damages awarded:

  4. Eastman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    384 So. 3d 865 (La. 2024)   Cited 5 times

    .See also, Stamps v. Dunham, 2007-0095, pp. 7-8 (La. App. 4 Cir. 9/19/07), 968 So. 2d 739, 744-45; McBride v. H. Brown Mach. Shop, 98-1271 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/31/99), 732 So. 2d 650, 652; Kistner v. King, 1998-641, p. 3 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/16/98), 726 So. 2d 68; Engolia v. Attain, 625 So. 2d 723, 728 (La. App. 1 Cir. 1993). In reviewing a JNOV, the appellate court must first determine if the trial judge erred in granting the JNOV.

  5. Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales

    938 So. 2d 35 (La. 2006)   Cited 57 times
    Finding res ipsa inappropriate in part because "plaintiffs did not adequately address the probability that a previous owner had accessed" the alleged defect in question

    1 Cir. 12/9/98), 744 So.2d 23. See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La. 6/18/97), 695 So.2d 1326; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, 583 So.2d 829 (La. 1991); State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/3/96), 673 So.2d 1249; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/10/95), 656 So.2d 700; Engolia v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723, 728 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1993); Adams v. Security Ins. Co. Of Hartford, 543 So.2d 480, 486 (La. 1989). Id. at 89 (emphasis added).

  6. Davis v. Witt

    851 So. 2d 1119 (La. 2003)   Cited 80 times
    In Davis v. Witt, 02-3102 (La. 7/2/03), 851 So. 2d 1119, we recognized that a commercial driver’s superior knowledge and training as a professional truck driver held him to a higher standard of care than the motoring public.

    Gibson v. Bossier City General Hospital, et al., supra. See also Engolia v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1993). Davis, 774 So.2d at 93.

  7. Martin v. Heritage Manor South

    784 So. 2d 627 (La. 2001)   Cited 94 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 2000-1023 (La. 4/03/2001), 784 So.2d 627, the supreme court explained that deciding whether to grant a new trial requires a discretionary balancing of many factors.

    Gibson v. Bossier CityGeneral Hospital, etal., supra. See alsoEngolia v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1993). (Emphasis added.)

  8. George v. Christus Health Sw. La.

    No. 24-5 (La. Ct. App. Aug. 21, 2024)

    d/b/a/ Piggly Wiggly, 97-1596 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/9/98), 744 So.2d 23. See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), 695 So.2d 1326; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, 583 So.2d 829 (La. 1991); State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/3/96), 673 So.2d 1249; Seagers v. Pailet, 95-52 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/10/95), 656 So.2d 700; Engolia v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723, 728 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1993); Adams v. Security Ins. Co. Of Hartford, 543 So.2d 480, 486 (La. 1989).

  9. Schilling v. Aurich

    91 So. 3d 580 (La. Ct. App. 2012)

    Gibson v. Bossier City General Hospital, et al., supra. [594 So.2d 1332 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991) ] See also Engolia v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir.1993). (Emphasis added.)

  10. Davis v. State

    78 So. 3d 190 (La. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 8 times

    Gibson v. Bossier City General Hospital, et al., supra. See also Engolia v. Allain, 625 So.2d 723 (La.App. 1 Cir.1993). (Emphasis added.)