English v. Smith

1 Citing case

  1. Kirk v. Kirk

    207 A.D.3d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)   Cited 6 times

    Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, he is not entitled to a credit for the payments he voluntarily made for the children's expenses. The separation agreement did not provide any offsets or credits to the plaintiff for any of his claimed payments (see Matter of English v Smith, 173 A.D.3d 1022, 1024; J.A.H. v E.G.M., 171 A.D.3d 710, 713; Shea v McFadden, 227 A.D.2d 543, 544; cf. Matter of McGovern v McGovern, 148 A.D.3d 900, 901; Matter of Brandt v Peirce, 132 A.D.3d 665).