From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Engles v. Bennett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2017
9:14-CV-1214 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2017)

Opinion

9:14-CV-1214

03-30-2017

JESSIE ENGLES, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS BENNETT and BRIAN DOUGHERTY, Defendants.


THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's March 9, 2017 Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 87] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 87] for the reasons stated therein. The defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt. # 33] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is denied with respect to the excessive force claim as against defendant Bennett, and granted in all other respects. The complaint is dismissed in its entirety as against defendant Dougherty.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:March 30, 2017

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Engles v. Bennett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2017
9:14-CV-1214 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Engles v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE ENGLES, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS BENNETT and BRIAN DOUGHERTY, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 30, 2017

Citations

9:14-CV-1214 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2017)