From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Englert, Inc. v. New Tech Machinery Corp.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Nov 3, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02118-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 3, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02118-WYD-CBS.

November 3, 2009


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on a review of Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claim One of Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Standing (docket #16), filed November 2, 2009. Attached to the Response are matters outside the pleadings, including a declaration, an assignment, and a patent assignment agreement.

The matters that Plaintiff attaches relate to Defendant's motion to dismiss which seeks dismissal under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). Accordingly, if the evidence is not excluded, the motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) shall be treated as a motion for summary judgment. FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b); Lucero v. Gunter, 52 F.3d 874, 877 (10th Cir. 1995).

I find that it is appropriate to consider the evidence Plaintiff attaches to its response in resolving Defendant's motion. Accordingly, notice is hereby given that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claim One of Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Standing Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. 12(b)(6) and Failure to Join a Party Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(7) (docket #14) shall be treated as a motion for summary judgment and the evidence attached to the response shall be considered. Conversion of a motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment is proper where, even though the motion does not rely on matters outside the pleadings, the response attaches such materials which are then considered by the court in deciding the motion. See Whitesel v. Sengenberger, 222 F.3d 861, 866 (10th Cir. 2000).

Any party who wishes to submit additional materials for the Court to consider in connection with the motion for summary judgment may do so by Thursday, November 12, 2009. Alternatively, Defendant may attach such matters in its reply brief.

In conclusion, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claim One of Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Standing Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. 12(b)(6) and Failure to Join a Party Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(7) (docket #14) is converted to a motion for summary judgment. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if any party wishes to submit additional materials to be considered in connection with the motion for summary judgment, it shall do so by Thursday, November 12, 2009. Alternatively, Defendant may submit such material in connection with its reply brief, which is due pursuant to the deadline set forth in D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1.C.


Summaries of

Englert, Inc. v. New Tech Machinery Corp.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Nov 3, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02118-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Englert, Inc. v. New Tech Machinery Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ENGLERT, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Plaintiff, v. NEW TECH MACHINERY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Nov 3, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02118-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 3, 2009)