From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Engels v. Town of Potsdam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 26, 2013
(N.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2013)

Opinion

08-26-2013

JAMES P. ENGELS, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF POTSDAM; JONATHAN RYAN, Environmental Conservation Officer; FRANK DUNNING, Town of Parishville Justice; SAMUEL CHARELSON, Town of Potsdam Justice; JONATHAN BECKER, Assistant District Attorney; and JOSHUA HABERKORNHALM, Assistant District Attorney, Defendants.

James P. Engels, Plaintiff pro se Carter, Conboy, Case, Blackmore, Maloney & Laird, P.C. Adam H. Cooper, Esq., of counsel Attorney for the Town of Potsdam and Samuel Charelson Shantz & Belkin M. Randolph Belkin, Esq., of counsel Attorney for Frank Dunning Hancock Estabrook LLP Zachary M. Mattison, Esq., of counsel Attorney for Jonathan Becker and Joshua HaberkornHalm


APPEARANCES: James P. Engels, Plaintiff pro se Carter, Conboy, Case, Blackmore, Maloney & Laird, P.C.
Adam H. Cooper, Esq., of counsel
Attorney for the Town of Potsdam and Samuel Charelson
Shantz & Belkin
M. Randolph Belkin, Esq., of counsel
Attorney for Frank Dunning
Hancock Estabrook LLP
Zachary M. Mattison, Esq., of counsel
Attorney for Jonathan Becker and Joshua HaberkornHalm

Hon. Norman A. Mordue, Senior U.S. District Judge:

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter has issued an Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) recommending sua sponte dismissal of this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As Magistrate Judge Baxter observes, plaintiff's complaint essentially challenges the procedures leading to the revocation of the conditional discharge of plaintiff's conviction under New York's Environmental Conservation Law for conditions at his junkyard, and the imposition of a large fine. Magistrate Judge Baxter recommends dismissal based on Heck v. Humphrey, on the ground that the revocation of plaintiff's conditional discharge and his resentencing have not been reversed on direct appeal. 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Further, Magistrate Judge Baxter recommends dismissal of plaintiff's claims against the judge who presided over his case, Town of Potsdam Justice Samuel Charelson, and the two Assistant District Attorneys who were involved in the violation hearing, Jonathan Becker and Joshua Haberkornhalm, on grounds of judicial and prosecutorial immunity.

Plaintiff objects (Dkt. No. 12). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court reviews Magistrate Judge Baxter's report and recommendations de novo. In his objection (Dkt. No. 12), plaintiff alleges for the first time that the revocation of his conditional discharge and the ensuing fine were reversed by St. Lawrence County Court on August 24, 2012 on the ground that the Town Court failed to comply with N.Y.C.P.L. § 410.70. Although plaintiff does not attach a copy of the County Court's decision, this allegation is sufficient to make out a plausible claim that the revocation and resentencing have been reversed on direct appeal as required by Heck. Given plaintiff's pro se status and under the circumstances of this case, the Court deems the facts alleged in plaintiff's objection to be part of plaintiff's complaint. Thus, sua sponte dismissal of the complaint based on the Heck rule is not warranted.

The Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Baxter that plaintiff's claims against Town of Potsdam Justice Samuel Charelson are barred by judicial immunity, and his claims against Assistant District Attorneys Jonathan Becker and Joshua Haberkornhalm are barred by prosecutorial immunity. As Magistrate Judge Baxter notes, the wrongful acts alleged against Town of Parishville Justice Frank Dunning took place after he was no longer presiding over the plaintiff's case. The Court leaves the question of whether plaintiff states a viable claim against Frank Dunning for resolution at a later stage in this case.

It is therefore

ORDERED that the Court deems the facts alleged in plaintiff's objection (Dkt. No. 12) to be part of plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1); and it is further

ORDERED that, based on the newly-alleged facts, the Court rejects so much of the Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6) of United States Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter as recommends sua sponte dismissal of plaintiff's claims against the Town of Potsdam; Jonathan Ryan, Environmental Conservation Officer; and Frank Dunning, Town of Parishville Justice; and it is further

ORDERED that in all other respects the Court accepts the Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6), and dismisses all claims against Samuel Charelson, Town of Potsdam Justice; Jonathan Becker, Assistant District Attorney; and Joshua Haberkornhalm, Assistant District Attorney; and it is further

ORDERED that the stay of initial proceedings is vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that the case shall proceed against the Town of Potsdam; Jonathan Ryan, Environmental Conservation Officer; and Frank Dunning, Town of Parishville Justice; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve copies of this Memorandum-Decision and Order in accordance with the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: August 26, 2013

Syracuse, New York

___________

Norman A. Mordue

Senior U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Engels v. Town of Potsdam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 26, 2013
(N.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Engels v. Town of Potsdam

Case Details

Full title:JAMES P. ENGELS, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF POTSDAM; JONATHAN RYAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 26, 2013

Citations

(N.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2013)