From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Engel v. Glick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1961
14 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

October 30, 1961


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, a pedestrian, when he was knocked down by a motor vehicle owned by defendant Glick and operated by defendant Sturgis, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 13, 1961, which denied their motion, made pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 187 of the Civil Practice Act, to change the venue of the action from Queens County to Sullivan County. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The accident occurred on the grounds of the Monticello Hospital in Sullivan County, while the plaintiff was visiting a patient at the hospital. After the accident plaintiff was admitted to the hospital and treated by its doctors. Under the circumstances here, there should be a change of venue from the urban county of Queens to the rural county of Sullivan, because: (1) the material witnesses to the accident, the hospital doctors who treated the plaintiff and the hospital records are in Sullivan County; (2) a transitory action should generally be tried in the county where it arose; and (3) in view of the comparative calendar conditions, a trial may be had in Sullivan County much earlier than in Queens County. Nolan, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Engel v. Glick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1961
14 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Engel v. Glick

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT ENGEL, Respondent, v. MORRIS GLICK, Doing Business as MURRAY GLICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Padilla v. Greyhound Lines

(2) All of the injured plaintiffs-respondents who survived the accident were examined and treated in…

Dalen v. Rosenberg

m its second, third, fifth and seventh decretal paragraphs and (2) by substituting therefor the following…