Summary
In Engel v. Gerstenfeld (184 App. Div. 953) a civil action was brought by the operator of a beauty parlor to recover the value of services in removing superfluous hair by the means of electrolysis.
Summary of this case from People v. LehrmanOpinion
June, 1918.
Present — Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ.
Order of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs, and judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence did not warrant the Appellate Term in deciding that the treatment administered by plaintiff constituted the practice of medicine, within the statutory definition thereof. (See 102 Misc. Rep. 97.)