From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Energy Transfer v. Friedman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 27, 2021
252 A.3d 1083 (Pa. 2021)

Opinion

No. 655 MAL 2020 No. 656 MAL 2020

04-27-2021

ENERGY TRANSFER, Respondent v. Eric FRIEDMAN, Petitioner Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent v. Eric Friedman, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does the Office of Open records have the authority to order the release of a record in Public Utility Commission's possession when the OOR determines that record does not contain Confidential Security Information as defined in the Confidential Security Information Act, 35 P.S. § 2141.3 et seq.? The Application for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by State Senators Katie J. Muth and Timothy P. Kearney is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Energy Transfer v. Friedman

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 27, 2021
252 A.3d 1083 (Pa. 2021)
Case details for

Energy Transfer v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:ENERGY TRANSFER, Respondent v. ERIC FRIEDMAN, Petitioner PENNSYLVANIA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 27, 2021

Citations

252 A.3d 1083 (Pa. 2021)

Citing Cases

Energy Transfer v. Friedman

Does the Office of Open Records have the authority to order the release of a record in Public Utility…