Opinion
Case No. 13-14241
11-19-2014
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE
On October 31, 2014, the court granted Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration, asserting that the court erred in dismissing the case. Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1 provides that a motion for reconsideration shall be granted only if the movant can (1) "demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled," and (2) "show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case." E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(3). "A 'palpable defect' is 'a defect that is obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain.'" United States v. Lockett, 328 F. Supp. 2d 682, 684 (E.D. Mich. 2004) (citing United States v. Cican, 156 F. Supp. 2d 661, 668 (E.D. Mich. 2001)). Upon review, the court will order Defendants to respond. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants file a response to Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration by December 2, 2014.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 19, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, November 19, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522