From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Endsley v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2014
Case No. CV 14-3091 UA (SS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-3091 UA (SS)

10-16-2014

MARC ANTHONY LOWELL ENDSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley is deemed a vexatious litigant; (2) Plaintiff's pending request for IFP status is DENIED (Dkt. No. 9); (3) the Clerk of the Court shall not file any civil complaint, habeas petition or IFP application by Endsley unless Endsley has filed a motion for leave to file a complaint, habeas petition or IFP application and a Judge of this Court has granted the leave requested; (5) Endsley must submit a copy of the Court's vexatious litigant order and a copy of the proposed filing with any motion seeking leave of court to file a new action; and (6) if the Court does not grant Endsley written permission to file the requested new action within thirty days of the date of his motion, permission will be deemed denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order on Plaintiffs at their current address of record. DATED: 10/16/14

/s/__________

DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Endsley v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2014
Case No. CV 14-3091 UA (SS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Endsley v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARC ANTHONY LOWELL ENDSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 16, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 14-3091 UA (SS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

Iegorova v. Feygan

Despite these warnings and guidance, as well as these courts' liberal granting of leave to amend, Plaintiff…

Iegorova v. Feygan

Despite these warnings and guidance, as well as these courts' liberal granting of leave to amend, Ms.…