From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Endresz v. Friedberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1967
28 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

October 31, 1967

Appeal from the Onondaga Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ. [ 52 Misc.2d 693.]


Order unanimously modified by denying leave to the plaintiff "to plead over and assert any causes of action which might be had under the theory expostulated in Ferrara v. Galluchio ( 5 N.Y.2d 16) ," and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Permission to plead over and assert causes of action which might be had under the theory of Ferrara v. Galluchio ( supra) is meaningless and futile inasmuch as there can be no sufficient causes of action under the facts here present under the theory of the Ferrara case, or otherwise.


Summaries of

Endresz v. Friedberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 31, 1967
28 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Endresz v. Friedberg

Case Details

Full title:STEVE L. ENDRESZ, as Administrator of the Estate of BABY BOY ENDRESZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)