From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Endres v. Mingles Restaurant LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 16, 1997
242 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 16, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.).


The motion was properly granted upon findings of an excusable lack of awareness on the part of incoming counsel that the case had been marked off the calendar, activity during the period the case was off calendar sufficient to show that there was no intention to abandon it, lack of prejudice to defendants as a result of the delay in restoring the case, and a meritorious cause of action ( see, Rutger Fabrics Corp. v. United States Laminating Corp., 111 A.D.2d 40).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Endres v. Mingles Restaurant LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 16, 1997
242 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Endres v. Mingles Restaurant LTD

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE ENDRES et al., Respondents, v. MINGLES RESTAURANT LTD. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 16, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

Zabari v. City of New York

In his original motion papers, plaintiff proffered his counsel's disability, which was caused by the latter's…

Goodstein Construction Corp. v. City of N.Y

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Fern Fisher-Brandveen, J.). The motion to vacate dismissal of…